Has anyone tried Deepseek V3? Does it work?

Though it’s hard to say about coding since it doesn’t have a feature like Claude Artifacts, where a separate window is created to see how the code looks as an output.

At first glance, it seems like a barebones version of GPT 4o or Microsoft Copilot, where you can upload documents or images (up to 50, text extraction only).

Plus, there’s no way to opt-out of using your data for training purposes, which is a huge issue (for the website version that is).

When a dog smells another dog’s poo or wee, do they then remember that scent for when they smell it again, or even further know which dog they are smelling if they know the dog?

But I find what makes it stand out from other LLMs is the Deepthinking feature.

So it’s a lot of copy and pasting when it comes to testing code on a separate website.

I’ve just tried Deepseek V3 just so I could answer your question.

Why is it called iOS 26? What happened to iOS 19 for iPhone - 9to5Mac

To answer your question, it definitely does work as an LLM.

It breaks down an instruction (or multiple instructions) as a chain-of-thought reasoning (or multiple micro steps) as it shows you its thinking process.

So my recommendation is to run Deepseek V3 locally (requires extremely expensive hardware).

Do all Koreans look like K-pop idols?

Has anyone tried Deepseek V3? Does it work?

Read also: